雅思寫作范文:政府應該主要投入理科教育嗎
時間:2023-12-05
來源:網絡
作者:未知
雅思備考與我們常規的中高考英語、大學四六級應該還是存在一些差異的,想要拿到高分并非易事,雅思考察學生的聽說讀寫四科能力,本期我們就帶大家一起來看拿一下往期的雅思寫作真題:政府應該主要投入理科教育嗎的范文,希望對備考雅思的同學們有所幫助!
題目:
Most of the government funding should be invested in teaching science rather than any other subjects in order for a country to develop and make progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
解析與審題
本題問:一個國家要發展進步,政府的錢主要應該花在理科(理工農醫等)教育上,而不是其他科目(歷史、文學、哲學、藝術等),你在何種程度上同意這個觀點?
本題中有most這種最高級詞匯,一般都是用“先揚后抑”的方式對題目觀點進行批判性論證。正常的寫作邏輯是這樣的:
引入話題;
政府應該投資理科教育,因為理科教育對國家的發展進步非常重要;
但其他科目對國家的發展進步也很重要:歷史讓我們記住過去,藝術能激勵我們,哲學讓我們思考。
因此,雖然我認為政府應該重視理科教育,甚至可以更重視理科教育,但不同意把多數錢都投給理科教育,而是應該也重視其他科目的教育。
本題在討論文科和理科各自重要性的時候,需要圍繞“為了國家的進步發展”來進行。
網絡7分范文
The reason why many people believe that most of the government funding should go to subjects such as engineering, agriculture, and medicine is probably that they have just a one-sided conception about what development and progress of a country really means.
The most obvious sign of a country’s development and progress is of course its economic prosperity and material wealth. In this sense, arguing that the government should mainly support science-related subjects makes a lot of sense. Only with enough talents working in various scientific fields can a country become strong economically. The more scientific and technological breakthroughs a country makes, the more developed it is. This has been proved true by the 19th-century U.K. and 20th-century U.S.A., who largely depended on, respectively, industrial revolution and automobile industry for their prosperity.
